College Athlete Influencer Marketing: What the NCAA Ruling Means to Your Brand

Reading Time: 17 Minutes

GRIN also recommends this free guide:

How to Find Influencers Guidebook

Download Guide

College sports made history this year when the NCAA lifted a host of restrictions on athletes related to benefits and brand endorsements.

College athlete influencer marketing has traditionally been a mutually beneficial relationship excluded to professional athletes and their brand partners. But as of July 1, everything has changed.

Bar graph of highest paid athletes
Image via Mekko Graphics

Endorsements as Percentage of Total Income

Roger Federer: $106M; 94% (Tennis)

Cristiano Ronaldo: $105M; 43% (Soccer)

Lionel Messi: $104M; 31% (Soccer)

Neymar: $96M; 26% (Soccer)

LeBron James: $88M; 68% (Basketball)

Stephen Curry: $74M; 59% (Basketball)

Kevin Durant: $64M; 55% (Basketball)

Tiger Woods: $62M; 96% (Golf)

Kirk Cousins: $61M; 4% (Football)

Carston Wentz: $59M; 7% (Football)

Tyson Fury: $57M; 12% (Boxing)

Russell Westbrook: $56M; 48% (Basketball)

Lewis Hamilton: $54M; 22% (Auto Racing)

Rory McIlroy: $52M; 58% (Golf)

Jared Goff: $49M; 4% (Football)

Conor McGregor: $48M; 33% (Mixed Martial Arts)

James Harden: $48M; 40% (Basketball)

Giannis Antetokounmpo: $48M; 59% (Basketball)

Anthony Joshua: $47M; 23% (Boxing)

Deontay Wilder: $47M; 1% (Boxing)

Thanks to intervention by the Supreme Court and a remarkable reverse decision by the NCAA, the creator economy now includes thousands of division I, II, and III athletes. These individuals may now leverage their name, image, and likeness (NIL) to  promote their favorite products and monetize their online presence.

A brief history of student athlete compensation struggles

Millions of teenagers and young adults dream of “making it big” in professional sports or winning an Olympic medal. For many of those individuals, obtaining a college scholarship through a reputable sports program is their chance to turn those dreams into reality.

Bar graph of the national collegiate athletic association revenue by segment from 2012 to 2020
Image via Statista

Revenue of the NCAA by segment from 2012 to 2020 (in million U.S. dollars)

2012

Television and marketing rights fees: 708.86M

Championships & NIT tournaments: 101.91M

Investment income: 29.54M

Sales and services: 24.16M

Contributions – facilities/other: 0.06M

Gain – other: –

Loss of revenue insurance: –

2013

Television and marketing rights fees: 726.39M

Championships & NIT tournaments: 110.63M

Investment income: 41.40M

Sales and services: 27.31M

Contributions – facilities/other: 7.07M

Gain – other: –

Loss of revenue insurance: –

2014

Television and marketing rights fees: 753.60M

Championships & NIT tournaments: 114.85M

Investment income: 82.27M

Sales and services: 28.32M

Contributions – facilities/other: 9.99M

Gain – other: –

Loss of revenue insurance: –

2015

Television and marketing rights fees: 776.58M

Championships & NIT tournaments: 119.82M

Investment income: -20.56M

Sales and services: 29.60M

Contributions – facilities/other: 6.91M

Gain – other: –

Loss of revenue insurance: –

2016

Television and marketing rights fees: 797.92M

Championships & NIT tournaments: 123.45M

Investment income: 35.64M

Sales and services: 32.10M

Contributions – facilities/other: 6.83M

Gain – other: –

Loss of revenue insurance: –

2017

Television and marketing rights fees: 821.39M

Championships & NIT tournaments: 129.40M

Investment income: 47.13M

Sales and services: 30.37M

Contributions – facilities/other: 6.74M

Gain – other: 26.34

Loss of revenue insurance: –

2018

Television and marketing rights fees: 844.27M

Championships & NIT tournaments: 133.37M

Investment income: 22.66M

Sales and services: 57.46M

Contributions – facilities/other: 6.65M

Gain – other: –

Loss of revenue insurance: –

2019

Television and marketing rights fees: 867.53M

Championships & NIT tournaments: 177.87M

Investment income: 14.57M

Sales and services: 55.40M

Contributions – facilities/other: 3.13M

Gain – other: –

Loss of revenue insurance: –

2020

Television and marketing rights fees: 165.23M

Championships & NIT tournaments: 15.80M

Investment income: 40.49M

Sales and services: 24.46M

Contributions – facilities/other: 3.21M

Gain – other: –

Loss of revenue insurance: 270M

NCAA institutions have been able to offer qualified athletes full-ride scholarships to complete their degree, and for a select few, help them go on to play for high-paying professional leagues.

The problem with this arrangement is that NCAA sports – particularly division I football and basketball – are industry cash cows. College athlete advocates note major discrepancies between what schools make off the talent of their players while those same players have barely a dollar to their name and many obstacles to overcome all for the chance to get rich in the NBA, NFL, MLS, MLB, and so on.

Quick take on statistics in collegiate sports
Image via The Budget Online

Quick Take

1% of College basketball players get drafted into the NBA

47,199 College football players sustained injuries from 2009-2013

$10 billion Growth of revenue from college sports form 2003-2018

12% Of revenue from college sports go to athlete scholarships

$2.9 million Spent on federal lobbying from 2014-2018 by the NCAA

Sources: The Atlantic, CDC and LA Times

Despite the economic setbacks of COVID-19, colleges with competitive sports teams generate massive profits from their athletics. But until recently, NCAA leadership has severely restricted any kind of benefits to college athletes. On the surface, their reasoning was sound – not every sports program is equally competitive or funded. 

Despite the NCAA’s best intentions, the reality was that many schools got richer, while athletes merely survived, unable to leverage their talent and personal brand to earn income.

Bar graph depicting how much debt student athletes in the US are in
Image via Statista

Amount of student debt incurred by NCAA student-athletes in the United States as of November 2019

0: 41%

$1-$10,000: 6%

$10,001-$20,000: 12%

$20,001-$40,000: 21%

$40,001 or more: 20%

Source: Gallup

Additional Information: United States; Gallup; November 2019; 4,889 respondents; 18 years and older; graduated 1990-2019; Online survey

These oppressive regulations turned into lawsuits and ongoing litigation, until the United States Supreme Court issued a warning to the NCAA.

“In a 9–0 unanimous decision, the Supreme Court upheld the lower court’s decision that NCAA restrictions on ‘education-related benefits’ for college athletes violated antitrust law.”

SI.com, 2021

In addition to the direct attack on the NCAA’s restrictions and caps on college athlete benefits, many indirect implications became apparent. One of these consequences was that it became illegal for the NCAA to not allow athletes to benefit financially from their own name, image, and likeness, otherwise known as NIL.

The NCAA ruling on student athletes

“Nowhere else in America can businesses get away with agreeing not to pay their workers a fair market rate on the theory that their product is defined by not paying their workers a fair market rate. The NCAA is not above the law.”

Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh

College sports operates as a business, to include large payrolls, marketing, sales, and multiple revenue streams. The recent Supreme Court ruling demanded that college athletes be allowed to receive reasonable compensation by way of college benefits.

Bar graph of NCAA average revenue by sport
Image via Business Insider

NCAA Average Revenue by Sport

Football: $31,924,154

Men’s Basketball: $8,193,344

Men’s Ice Hockey: $2,861,394

Women’s Basketball: $1,812,159

Baseball: $1,399,338

Track and Field: $1,274,032

Men’s Lacrosse: $1,005,477

Equestrian: $972,970

Women’s Ice Hockey: $960,466

Rowing: $932,646

Swimming and Diving: $858,029 

Women’s Volleyball: $803,713

Women’s Soccer: $784,817

Women’s Lacrosse: $709,286

Softball: $697,386

SOURCE: Department of Education based on average revenue from 127 FBS schools

In response to this federal ruling, NCAA leadership took immediate action to lift all relevant restrictions, including those related to NIL.

Benefits for athletes

Because some college sports programs have greater resources than others, the NCAA intended to level the playing field by placing heavy restrictions on various benefits for its athletes. But as of July 1, those restrictions have been deemed unlawful. 

It is now up to state governments and school policy to decide what is and is not permissible when it comes to compensating their athletes, both monetarily or otherwise.

Name, Image, Likeness (NIL)

Similarly, all NCAA restrictions pertaining to NIL and athlete endorsements are lifted. College athletes may now invest in their personal brand and monetize their fan base through partnerships and/or their own entrepreneurial enterprise.

State adoption for new NIL regulations

In the wake of rulings from the Supreme Court and NCAA, both entities left the final decision up to each individual state on what (if any) restrictions on college benefits and NIL would be.

Map of which states have signed NIL bills into law
Image via Business of College Sports

Last updated: September 21, 2021

The map below tracks states where governors have signed NIL bills into law.

Oregon

California

Nevada

Arizona

New Mexico

Texas

Montana

Nebraska

Colorado

Oklahoma

Arkansas

Missouri

Illinois

Michigan

Ohio

Pennsylvania

New Jersey

Connecticut

Delaware

Maryland

Because of the economic benefits related to attracting and retaining top college athletes, many states sprang into action and issued their own set of laws to guide universities (states in green above have already enacted NIL laws for college athletes).

Of those states that have yet to finalize legislation, most are well on their way and plan to put new laws in place within the next year or two.

What this ruling means for college athlete influencer marketing

“Influencer marketing was growing remarkably fast without the help of collegiate sports. But now that college athletes may partner with their favorite brands, influencer marketing is long past the ‘fad’ or trend’ stage – it is the future of digital and word-of-mouth marketing.”

Business 2 Community, What Does the NCAA’s NIL Ruling Mean for Marketers?

Influencers, celebrity endorsements, and brand ambassadors all function within the creator economy. The NCAA’s NIL ruling creates enormous opportunities for brands, particularly for those that manage influencer programs through social media.

1. There are significantly more individuals joining the creator economy.

The first and most obvious benefit of NIL privileges for college athletes is that brands have more people to choose from to represent them to niche audiences.

But it isn’t just sports brands that can benefit from partnerships with college athletes. The majority of NCAA athletes maintain skills and aspirations outside of the sport that brought them their sports scholarship. Brands that build meaningful relationships with those individuals can unlock new opportunities to expand their reach and engage untapped audiences on that individual’s favorite social channels.

2. Athlete influencer marketing is more diverse.

Prior to July, brands seeking athlete endorsements could really only recruit from professional athletes. But all that has changed. 

Brands can target more nuanced audiences with the help of younger, more diverse groups of creators. This benefit is particularly relevant when reaching Gen Z consumers, the next generation of conscientious and digitally-connected customers.

3. Brands are reaching different audiences online through division I, II, and III college athletes.

While the most well-known college athletes compete in division I football and basketball, brands are paying close attention to smaller programs that have extremely loyal, albeit regionally-specific fans.

There are countless influencer marketing opportunities for athletes within every NCAA sport across every division. Famous college athletes can make a “big splash” at a higher price point, but talented athletes with a small, local, and engaged following can interact with fans on a more personal level.

4. Legal compliance is a much bigger issue.

Kristi A. Dosh, an attorney and sports analyst, notes that many college campuses are scrambling to take advantage of NIL opportunities while also trying to understand what the new laws require. For this reason, college athlete endorsement deals are happening faster than universities can keep up with.

As time goes on, the confusion will subside, but not before sports programs recognize the need for NIL compliance personnel. Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling, states will have their own laws, and institutions must also form policies to protect the organization, staff members, and their athletes.

For those schools that are more proactive, leaders have established educators to advise student athletes on how to leverage their social media effectively and know which brand deals are legal and in a student’s best interest. 

5. Influencer costs and payments are changing.

New NIL privileges don’t just allow brands to work directly with college athletes – brands and colleges can (and many already have) work with entire sports teams and programs. This impacts how brands negotiate deals and disburse payments.

As state laws stabilize, brands, schools, and athletes must learn to transact legally while also maintaining collaborative brand-creator relationships. 

6. There are more opportunities for college athletes to generate income and build a professional future.

Perhaps the most exciting consequence of the NCAA’s NIL ruling is the fact that college athletes may invest in their own brand and think beyond the sports scholarships or trying to make it pro. 

Those with more entrepreneurial aspirations will be able to leverage their personal brand to become full-time creators or launch a unique product or service. Brand partnerships will help these new creators develop a business and financial sense that can help them long after their prime sports days are over.

How brands are taking advantage of the NIL ruling

“One-off” endorsement deals

Traditional celebrity endorsements through “one-off” campaigns still have their place, even as long-term micro and nano influencer relationships assume a more dominant role in modern digital word-of-mouth.

Some brands have begun working through agencies to find willing partners among college athletes. That said, agency-managed athlete endorsements consistently underperform in today’s modern creator landscape where authenticity remains the key to connecting with consumers.

“Believable creator endorsements come from having an authentic relationship with the brand. And you can’t have an authentic relationship without direct, open communication.”

GRIN, Say No to the Middleman

Long-term ambassador and affiliate partnerships

The most popular kinds of brand-athlete partnerships are ambassador and affiliate programs. College athletes “onboard” with a brand, embrace its mission/vision, and learn how to showcase the products that they will be promoting. 

After vetting a college athlete thoroughly, brands can identify a great match and invest in that relationship over the course of several months and years.

Brand deals for an entire team or sports department

Brands are also reaching out to university sports departments and teams with offers to back as many athletes as are interested in a partnership. While the school would retain earnings/benefits generated from its own NIL (such as the team branding, logo, facilities, etc.), the athletes may also receive compensation for their participation.

Headline of "Ole Miss Football Team Offered NIL Deal from Blue Delta Jeans" example of college athlete influencer marketing
Image via Business of College Sports

Notable examples of this approach include Georgia Tech’s partnership with TiVo and Ole Miss’s deal with Blue Delta Jeans.

Conclusion

The recent NCAA ruling has opened new opportunities for brands and young athletes to work together. Many questions remain unanswered, such as how brand endorsements will impact the quality of collegiate sports and how state authorities will enforce new NIL regulations.

But the reality is that college athletes have now entered the creator economy, whether or not schools, fans, and players are ready for what is about to happen in the world of social commerce.
Recruiting influencer athletes has never been easier. Use GRIN to find your brand champions.

Learn more about influencer marketing: Influencer Marketing 101

Updated: June 2023

Was this article helpful? Give it a share!

Want to be the first to know what’s new in the creator economy?

Our team keeps a finger on the pulse, so you’re always working with the latest information.

Get the GRIN newsletter for all the trends and insights you need to grow your business.

Written by GRIN Contributor

GRIN is the pioneer behind the world’s first Creator Management platform built to support every brand’s journey to connecting with consumers through authentic creator relationships. Thousands of the world’s fastest-growing brands—including SKIMS, Warby Parker, Allbirds, Mejuri, and MVMT—use GRIN to make creators feel like trusted, empowered partners and work with them to build their brands into household names.

All-in-one creator management platform helping ecommerce companies build more valuable brands through the power of creator partnerships.

© Grin Technologies Inc. 2022. All rights reserved.

Introducing
GRIN's Discovery Suite

Discover

Supercharge Your
Influencer Discovery Efforts

GRIN favicon
Get started

GRIN's NEW
Discovery Suite

Supercharge Your Influencer Discovery Efforts

GRIN's NEW
Discovery Suite

Introducing

GRIN's

Discovery Suite

Compare the Time of a Manual Process vs. GRIN

Compare the Time of a Manual Process vs. GRIN

GRIN favicon

GRIN + Uber Case Study

How did one person build Uber's robust TikTok community from scratch?

Find out here

+

Uber logo

Introducing GRIN
Professional Services

Our team of experts is ready to drive the results you need.

Learn more